On my clients at the path /Users/Shared/NFS/ I have a folder for each line in the exports config file. On macOS 10.13.4, all I have inside an Automator app is a do shell script of:Ĭode: Select all mount_nfs 192.168.1.60:/Backity/Video /Users/Shared/NFS/Video Looking at one example of zfs datasets of the pool Backity in /etc/exports:Ĭode: Select all /Backity/Video -quiet -mapall=root -network 192.168.1.0 -mask 255.255.255.0 Successfully upgraded 'tank' from version 28 to feature flags.I use NAS4Free to create an extra copy of my data… This system supports ZFS pool feature flags. Scan: scrub in progress since Fri Jul 25 18:58:48 2014Ģ8.2G scanned out of 579G at 30.1M/s, 5h11m to go #Openzfs sharenfs proScrubbing the zpool on a 2007 17″ MacBook Pro with 4GB RAM That aside, OpenZFS on OS X performed well, scrubbing the zpool on the 2007 MacBook Pro did not cause the CPU to spike at all, there is now a shorter delay in iTunes when starting to play a track but haven’t noticed any drops in audio yet, so things are looking positive. If you want to eject a disk, you still have to export the pool manually from terminal, pressing the eject button in finder will remove the disk icon but the filesystem is still mounted. The integration with OS X is still missing though it seems that on boot zpools are imported, I’ve not worked out if that’s because the system caches the state from previous boot or this is the preliminary support for auto mounting? The OpenZFS on OS X disk image comes with uninstall scripts for Zevo & though the main script was unable to detect the installed copy of Zevo, I was able to run the subsequent scripts individually to remove Zevo from my system and reboot (eject the disk containing the filesystem beforehand (export the zpool)). The two things which where annoying about Zevo was that it was a dead end, development had stopped, the last version available wasn’t compatible with Mavericks available and its conservative memory setting meant that disk performance wasn’t that great, during playing audio files it would break to buffer audio in iTunes for example (luckily not in Serato as mid set would’ve been embarrassing).Īs the MacBook Pro was running low on disk space I tried to move around 40GB of files in several chunks in parallel to my external USB3 disk & noticed the CPU pegged and fans started up with Zevo too. OpenZFS on OS X is fairly robust now (though still rough around the edges) so I decided to switch over. I continued to try newer builds on my MacBook Air but stuck with Zevo on my 2007 MacBook Pro. When the OpenZFS on OS X development began just over a year ago, I ran the test builds that where made available, though these supported new features through feature flags it was very early days, attempting to scrub a zpool on a i7 MacBook Air with a USB 3 disk would spike the CPU for the duration and again the integration was still missing, you manually had to import & export pools. Zevo had much better integration with OS X e.g disk would be automatically mounted when connected to system just like any other disk with a supported file system and it supported a v28 of the filesystem whereas MacZFS supported a much older version. Prior to the development of OpenZFS on OS X, the two choices for using ZFS on OS X where Zevo or MacZFS, Zevo originally started out as a commercial product but switched to a freebie after Greenbytes picked it up. #Openzfs sharenfs macI recently moved my last Mac from Greenbytes Zevo to OpenZFS on OS X, the reason for both sticking with Zevo & switching to OpenZFS were one and the same, CPU usage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |